diff --git a/content/post/algebraic-python-enums.md b/content/post/algebraic-python-enums.md
index d36a6a4a..0f08bda7 100644
--- a/content/post/algebraic-python-enums.md
+++ b/content/post/algebraic-python-enums.md
@@ -1,7 +1,12 @@
 ---
 title: "Algebraic Python Enums"
 date: 2025-11-02T19:08:46+05:30
-draft: true
+draft: false
+tags:
+- Python
+- Decorators
+- Rust
+- Algebraic Data Types
 ---
 
 As much as I like rust for its ergonomic features, University has forced me to use Python for the past couple of months, especially because of the hype for machine learning and data science.
@@ -12,7 +17,11 @@ Fortunately, since Python 3.8, creating structs has been a breeze using the data
 
 To that end, creating the equivalent to Rust's enum types involves Python union types.
 
+## First draft
+
 ```python
+# glass_enum.py
+
 from dataclasses import dataclass
 
 @dataclass
@@ -29,7 +38,7 @@ Glass = Empty | Full
 This allows us to define functions that ingest the `Glass` datatype.
 
 ```python
-def report_drink(glass: Glass):
+def report_drink(glass: Glass) -> str:
   match glass:
     case Empty:
       return "Whoops, looks like you've finished your drink!"
@@ -37,9 +46,9 @@ def report_drink(glass: Glass):
       return f"Ah a {drink}, what a fine taste!"
 ```
 
-The only downside to this is that there's no namespaceing of these union types and as such, methods cannot be defined on the `Union` of the different variants.
+## Pitfalls
 
-In the case of our concrete example, we can't add methods to the `Glass` type.
+### No direct variant access
 
 Since there is no namespacing, we also can't instantiate variants under the `Glass` namespace. The following code does not work.
 
@@ -48,7 +57,128 @@ dr_pepper = Glass.Full("Dr. Pepper")
 ```
 
 This can be partially solved by putting the entire enumerable type inside a module.
+Here we have saved the file as `glass_enum.py`. From a different module we can
+access the variants as `glass_enum.Empty` and `glass_enum.Full`.
 
-So now we can access the variants as `glass_enum.Empty` and `glass_enum.Full`.
+```py
+# main.py
+import glass_enum
 
-Even if we use module level namespacing, it's simply not possible to define any message on a union type in Python.
+fanta = glass_enum.Full('Fanta')
+empty = glass_enum.Empty()
+```
+
+Now any function outside the module has to ingest a rather confusing argument of type `glass_enum.Glass`.
+
+```python
+def refill(glass: glass_enum.Glass) -> glass_enum.Glass:
+  # ...
+  return glass
+```
+
+Since using a module namespace only causes more confusion, we will discard this idea.
+
+### No methods on the enum itself
+
+With no namespaceing, methods cannot be defined on the `Union` of the different variants.
+
+In the case of our concrete example, we can't add methods to the `Glass` type.
+
+```python
+def refill(glass: Glass) -> Glass:
+  if glass.is_empty(): # can't implement on type `Glass` directly
+    return Full('water')
+  return glass
+```
+
+Even if we use module level namespacing, it's simply not possible to define any method on a `Union` type in Python.
+
+To define a method like `is_empty()`, it must be implemented on both the classes `Full` and `Empty`. This can get
+tedious if there are 3 or more variants.
+
+## Python is a sneaky language
+
+Last week I discovered that Python allows creating nested classes to keep things organized.
+
+```python
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+
+class Glass:
+  @dataclass
+  class Empty:
+    pass
+
+  @dataclass
+  class Full:
+    drink: str
+```
+
+Python will happily run the above code and we can access the "variants" under the `Glass` namespace.
+
+```python
+lemonade = Glass.Full('lemonade')
+```
+
+If only we could register the variants as the `Glass` type itself and inherit all its methods.
+
+### Redecorate
+
+We can define a decorator that takes all of the nested dataclasses and makes them inherit the outer class.
+
+```python
+import inspect
+
+def AlgebraicEnum(cls):
+    for subclass_name, subclass in inspect.getmembers(cls, predicate=inspect.isclass):
+        if subclass_name != "__class__":
+            setattr(cls, subclass_name, type(subclass_name, (cls, subclass), {}))
+
+    return cls
+```
+
+That's all there is to the magic! Now we can simply add this decorator above the previous class declaration
+and the variants like `Glass.Empty` and `Glass.Full` would be of the type `Glass`.
+
+```python
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+
+@AlgebraicEnum
+class Glass:
+  @dataclass
+  class Empty:
+    pass
+
+  @dataclass
+  class Full:
+    drink: str
+
+  def report_drink(self) -> str:
+    match self:
+      case Glass.Empty:
+        return "Whoops, looks like you've finished your drink!"
+      case Glass.Full(drink):
+        return f"Ah a {drink}, what a fine taste!"
+
+  def is_empty(self) -> str:
+    match self:
+      case Glass.Empty:
+        return True
+    return False
+```
+
+As a bonus, the variants will also inherit any methods defined on the `Glass` type.
+
+Note how the `report_drink` method accepts a `self` of type `Glass` and the match arms
+compare it with `Glass.Empty` and `Glass.Full`.
+
+These methods get automatically called via the method resolution order chain due to the inheritance.
+
+## Closing thoughts
+
+Those 6 lines are the bare minimum of what you can do right now to have well organized and namespaced algebraic enums in Python
+which are somewhat comparable to those in Rust. These enums also play nicely with static type checkers
+and _goto-definitions_ will also lead you to the correct class defining a variant or the enum itself.
+
+I have packaged this decorator with a couple more typing restrictions into a library at [github:lavafroth/ape](https://github.com/lavafroth/ape).
+
+I hope you enjoyed this foray into contorting Python.